The Surface To Air System
  • Home
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Members Section
    • 2018/2019 National RPO Clinics
    • 2019 National RPO Clinic
    • S2A glossary
  • CoachTube and Course Vault
    • Installation One
    • Installation Two
    • Installation Three
    • Game Planning Installation Course
  • Spread Defensive Masterminds
  • Store
  • Subscription
  • Blog
  • S2A Buyers Club
  • S2A glossary
  • S27
  • Clinic Bundle

“Why in the hell would I pay for that?”

3/15/2019

1 Comment

 

The top ways to “hard core” get better as a football coaching staff

I started off this piece with a quote I blurted out in 2007 to a head high school coach while I observed his team’s practice. I distinctly remember everything about our exchange that day because it was the first time I had been exposed to a staff employing an offensive football system that they annually paid for. It was distinct and memorable because I was shocked. The coach was a student of the game, and an up and coming star in the business. He later went on to win a state championship (still using the system) at the highest level in his football crazed southern state.

The things he impressed upon me that day as a rebuttal to my knee jerk statement, in part, lead to these reasons for investing in a Football System for a coaching staff. Our conversation also impressed upon me, the things that did not work for the coach in terms of employing and teaching a staff a sound offensive system

I was shocked anyone would pay for an offense

the top 5 ways to NOT get better as a coaching staff this off-season

WHAT WILL NOT IMPROVE YOUR STAFF
(when deciding on a system)
1. Do you really want to improve, or do you just want your “ear tickled”?

“Mega clinics” are good if you already have a masters degree in the subject/topic being taught by the clinician. However, if you and your staff are looking to install a new scheme, you’ll learn just enough to get your butt beat in the fall by listening to an expert in a 2-3 hour clinic format. Quite simply, there’s not enough time for even the best teacher to provide you enough content to install a new scheme.

2. In this case, stories do not sale

There is an old saying in sales, “Facts tell, and stories sale”. That saying does not apply when wanting to become an expert in football in your chosen scheme. Podcasts, for example, are a new phenomenon in long form interviews. They are beginning to capture the free time of many football coaches. However, most coaches learn visually. A story can entertain, but seeing the film and the schematic diagrams create the best in football learning. If you’re “old school” this applies to 99% of coaching books too. These mediums (podcasts and books) should be used as a supplement to your scheme, not as a means to become an expert in your scheme.

3. It’s not, “A picture is worth a thousand words”, AKA: “Beware of Clinic-talk guy”.

Here’s another an old adage that you can stand on (Old adages are old because they’ve stood the test of time).
--
 “Don’t tell me show me”.
Do not trust a coach, no matter how well meaning, that quotes what others do, and that only shows diagrams. The best coaching resume is in the film he shows. I don’t respect a coach that tells me all about a scheme and a technique that he can’t back up with his own team’s film.

4. It’s not Friend Business, it’s Show Business

An old coaching friend used to tell me “A hunter is judged by the pelts on his wall.” In football I’m not necessarily talking about rings and championships, our game has to be evaluated by all things contextual (examples: how good was the defense and how tough was the schedule). If you are going to learn from an offensive coach, ask yourself these questions before preceding:
  1. Has he been in charge of the offense (play calling and coordinating)?
  2. Is his scheme taking advantage of his talent, or is his talent making the scheme look good?
  3. Has his scheme stood the test of time? Has it statistically been consistent in overall good team years and in bad team years?
  4. Is the scheme the coach is teaching moving the chains? More 1st downs, more touchdowns?
  5. Can the coach competently explain the answers? When teaching and learning a system there has to be answers to the answers. Does this system provide that?

5. Will they be there for you?

Let’s say you’ve spent three days with another staff, and you and your staff have immersed yourselves in their scheme. Now you go home, and the inevitable comes up, “Now what?”. Questions should and will arise.

“Now what?”

A coaching staff that is truly trying to get better and implement a new scheme is going to have more questions than answers. If you and your staff invest in a way to learn a system, then there better be a way to get answers, and get them fast. If that’s not the case, then you probably are spending your time in the wrong place.

the top 5 ways to get better as a coaching staff this off-season

WHAT WILL IMPROVE YOUR STAFF
(when deciding on a system)
1. Are we apples to apples here?

The superior approach is to learn and study from your team’s peer group of coaches. Specifically from coaches that are facing the same problems you are. 99% of the coaches reading this can far better appreciate the problems a high school coach goes through than what Nick Saban and Alabama goes through. I argue that in football more true learning and implementation is flowing up from high school to college, rather than from a D1 program down to a high school or small college program.

2. How long does this last?

The items on the following list are considered one time resources, as opposed to a living long term resource:
  • Courses
  • Playbooks
  • Clinics
  • DVD’s
  • Webinars
  • Books.

If your source for staff betterment consists of one-time resources then you’re not getting the most for your staff.

Going back to the point above that asks, “Will they be there for you?” The answer in terms of the one time resource is NO. The counter to this lies in a one year subscription. Why? It forces the provider to improve, and constantly add. Bottom line, the subscription provider is going to answer when you need the question answered.


3. Value as opposed to cost

Definitively cost vs. value can be defined as: Cost is the amount incurred in the production of goods, i.e., it is the money value of the resources involved in producing something. Conversely, value implies the utility of worth of the commodity of service for an individual.

When determining the question, “Why in the hell would I pay for that?”, ask yourself and the staff:

“Does this system provide us, as a staff, the resources to better ourselves and provide us the value to help our team win more games?”

And, it’s well to remember, free does not equate to better. “Free” usually ends up one of two ways:
  1. It will not provide the depth of content you need to improve
  2. The content provider is not motivated to provide you with everything


4. I’ve only got one assistant in the building

The coach I spoke with in 2007 utilized this point as his main emphasis in investing in a system. He argued, “If the majority of my staff members work outside the school building (they have professions other than coaching and teaching), then how am I to assume they are partaking in professional development to better themselves when it comes to an offensive or defensive scheme?”

Clinics, books, courses, and webinars will barely scratch the surface. Invest in something that is on-going and deep when determining how a staff will improve itself.


5. Check the boxes
If a staff truly wants to immerse themselves in a new/better system, then make sure you are receiving the best by checking all the boxes:
  • Do you have access to system 24/7 like an extra assistant coach?
  • Is the system consistently providing you with updated content?
  • Is the system constantly answering your questions?
  • Does the system respond to you quickly?
  • Has the system provided your entire staff equal access to all the materials?
  • Has the system held anything back, do you have 100% access to all their materials?
  • Does the system constantly improve their schemes and provide you with the results?
  • Do you have all the system resources provided and at your disposal?
    • Digital playbook?
    • Video Playbook?
    • Game Film?
    • Cut-ups?
    • Tutorials?
    • A Web based platform to get questions answered like a staff meeting?
    • An instant messenger to get instant answers and feedback?
    • A community of like-minded coaches that can pitch in with more detail?
  • Do you have a voice to request more information on a vital topic?

Is your staff interested in a system?

[Full disclosure: As the author of this post I must also confess I am co-founder of The Surface to Air System, an offensive consulting service] But what I have laid out is the truth when a staff truly decides it wants to take the next step in immersing themselves in a learning system.

Interested? Want more? Is there a trial period?

subscription and FREE trial

not sure? Here are some myths/Facts about joining our system

  • Myth: Only poor/losing coaches would do that
  • Fact: S2A has multiple staffs that have coached in and won multiple State Championships (S2A serves 4 College level staffs)
  • Myth: It costs too much
  • Fact: Joining S2A is far more cost effective than attending clinics
  • Fact: We work with full payments and can discount for full payment
  • Fact: We work with school P.O.'s
  • Fact: We work on payment plans
  • Fact: We offer a trial period
  • Fact: We have never been asked by a client to refund their purchase
  • Myth: I can't utilize my own language and parts of my own system
  • Fact: S2A was designed so that you can incorporate the whole or parts of the system
  • Myth: I can't incorporate the System with my JV and Freshmen teams
  • Fact: We have numerous clients that even utilize the system with their youth level teams
  • Myth: My whole staff can not be on the plan
  • Fact: Your entire staff is entitled to the entire system as long as they remain on your staff

Need more?

Call us directly at 615-556-9599
or email us at info@surfacetoairsystem.com
Subscription and free trial
1 Comment

Q & A from emails about s2a GPS

2/6/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
The Game Practice System (GPS) has sparked a lot of questions. From time to time we will share our answers to better help coaches implement segments of this new way to practice.

Picture

Question:

From a Defensive Coordinator in Tennessee:
I don't see how the defense prepares for a split back veer team one week, a flex bone the next, and a wing t team the next. Do you have a separate practice plan for defense? 

Answer:

Currently, we do not have defensive schedules made for sharing. We created the book and its main tenants for our team(s) and primarily for our offensive system (S2A). If you employ a 2 platoon personnel team it's simple because the defense is doing their own thing while the Offense is doing theirs. If you are 1 platoon (majority of your squad going both ways) then it's tougher because in our view (and stated in the book) you must practice all 3 phases of the game everyday. 

We feel the role of a HS defensive coordinator is the toughest job in all of football because of what you've brought up with preparation against Wing-T, split back veer, and flex bone, etc. No one at any level, other than HS, faces that variety - Belichick would struggle in HS.

With all that being said, lets be specific in terms of how a DC in HS would implement GPS (assuming you're a 1 platoon team) 

First, and please note from the book, we utilize all 4 days (Monday-Thursday) in terms of full GPS practices. That means Team (11-11 Situations) is practiced for 12 five minute periods throughout the 4 day week (6 for Offense and 6 for Defense). So, if a 4 day week is utilized, you are stealing time for every facet of your prep. We feel many coaches make Thursdays an off day (walk-through). Science is proving that athletes need neuromuscular stimulation closer to game time, not the opposite.

Look at a Monday schedule (offensive emphasis - GPS) for a 1 platoon team.
Picture
Notice the O or D in front of Shells, Inside, S27, and 11-11 (O = offensive emphasis and D = defensive emphasis). As the DC you may structure your periods (D) how you like in order to see what you need. However, we argue that scout cards shouldn't be utilized until 11-11 (team). We feel players get better by competing and reacting to good competition, not necessarily to a poor scout team trying to simulate an offense they can't duplicate. 

Utilize Walks

Walks (walkthroughs before practice): We feel we didn't make ample room in the book for emphasizing Defensive Walks. Walks is the time BEFORE practice that allows for teaching a concept in a slower paced environment. Because GPS is a shorter and more intense style of practice (12 five min. periods), time can be stolen (added) in walks - 10/15 min offense, and 10/15 min. defense. During this time a lot of Defensive concepts can be taught vs. a scout offense that won't look like a rugby scrum (as does happen a lot in scout team for defensive emphasis).

Now let's look at Day 2 for 1 platoon with D emphasis - NOTE typo (1) is supposed to be (2)
Picture
As you can see, the D and O flops to create more time for the Defense.

Again, it's our philosophy in S2A GPS that players get better by simulating things and competing at game speed. We feel a defensive player will get better if he's coached hard in Shells, Inside, and S27 REGARDLESS of the scheme he's defending. Stance, Alignment, General assignment responsibility (deep 1/3, C gap, force/contain), Read keys, and 1st steps transcend the offensive scheme being defensed. 


It goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway, these periods for defensive players (regardless of O or D emphasis) should always be coached with a keen eye for pursuit, effort, proper block destruction, and overall defensive pride. If a coach and a player enters Shells, Inside, S27, and 11-11 with these thoughts then they will improve on a daily basis regardless of what scheme they have to face.

Bottom line:
  1. If you utilize walks each day for proper alignment, recognition, assignments, and adjustments time for the offensive scheme(s) you'll face, then you will have "stolen" an extra 40 to 60 minutes in prep.
  2. If you teach your kids on defense to approach every facet of practice (when they align defensively), regardless of emphasis or scheme, to work on defensive tenants of the game, then they will be good! There's NEVER an excuse to not properly align, be in a good stance, know the responsibility, know the key(s), take a good 1st step, pursuit, take on and properly shed blocks, and play with effort!
  3. Kids will benefit more and obtain better skill habits when they compete 
  4. Kids get into poor habits and create shortcuts when going against a poor scout team look. The whole thing looks like a cluster, and a rugby scrum. No one benefits from this
  5. Judiciously utilize defensive emphasis in 11-11 Team periods for scouts, remember you have 4 days! Space out what you will emphasize to take away from the offense each day
  6. If you plan walkthroughs, coach fundamentals in all periods, and carefully plan D emphasis 11-11 team then you will be thoroughly prepared for any week to week offensive scheme. ​
Picture
Need more ideas about restructuring practices? GPS is on sale now on Amazon. BUY IT HERE

Tweet

Got questions - send them in. we will answer!

Submit
1 Comment

Are drills a waste of time?

2/5/2019

1 Comment

 
“I never devise a drill to suit every skill in my position group. That drill doesn't exist. The best player doesn't need what the worst player can't do, and the worst player can't do what comes naturally to the best player” —Unknown Coach*
*The Unknown Coach quotes come from an amalgamation of coaching statements collected by the authors over several years about drills in the game of football.

Shifting the Paradigm Away from Traditional Drills

Drills, Drills, Drills. At Surface to Air System we felt we might stand alone, in our view of drills, from that of the popular crowd. A question as old as time in coaching has always been: "You got a drill for that?" Our answer, "not really", so instead of going to find one, or making one up, we decided to write a book about it.
Picture
Go to our website page S27 to learn more on GPS



We agree!

We don't agree with everything LeCharles Bentley espouses about coaching, but we do know he's an authority within his craft. His takes are intelligent and thought out, so we felt we would share his provocative thoughts on drills.

Below is an excellent article by LeCharles Bentley of Offensive Line Performance (OLP)
- @OLPerformance on twitter - on drills in the game of football, particularly for the position of offensive line.
Picture
Link HERE to OLP Article

Video clip from the OLP Lounge:

    Let us know how we can serve you and your staff through S2A

Submit
1 Comment

Why we do indy at the end of an s2a practice

1/29/2019

0 Comments

 

...aND SOMETIMES WE DON'T EVEN DO IT

Picture

A GLIMPSE INSIDE GAME PRACTICE SYSTEM (GPS)

AN INNOVATIVE RESTRUCTURING OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL PRACTICES

CHAPTER FOUR: INDY/OPPS

“Order and simplification are the first steps toward the mastery of a subject.”
—Thomas Mann

The term Indy/Ops, its concept, and where it occurs in the practice model (much like the rest of GPS) is unique.

To clarify, Indy is short for individual period, and Ops is short for opportunity.

In GPS an individual period for 1 on 1’s, or the small group teaching of fundamentals and skills is placed at the end of practice . We feel, and the data supports it, that an isolated teaching of a skill better fits when it is taught from a whole game-like scenario - as in Shells. However, there will be times where a player is not “mastering” the needed skill to operate within a full team concept. This is where Indy/Opps comes into the S2A GPS. Traditionally, football practices have placed concentrated individual time at the front of a full practice, The GPS method places it at the end of a practice.

The rationale behind an end of practice Indy/Opps

Part of the GPS method of practice comes from an educational theory, called Mastery. In part, “Mastery” contends that a student is given a concept to understand and apply, then the student is tested and evaluated for mastery of that concept. The law of averages says that a large segment of the students will indeed master the age/level appropriate concept and graduate to the next level and/or task. However, a certain portion of the group of students will not achieve mastery and thus are placed behind the others. This is where reteaching and reassessing of the concept takes place. In the GPS method of football practice, the same premise of mastery occurs.

The phases of a full GPS practice progress from the introduction to a concept, the mastery of a concept, to a possible reteaching, or Indy/Opps, of the concept.

Indy/Opps is the equivalent to re-teaching a concept in the educational classroom. From what we have already covered in our philosophy and beliefs about drills, it is our strongly held belief that not all athletes are created equal, and thus they should not be coached/taught that way either. Therefore we contend that young players, back ups, and main substitutes can more acutely be brought up to higher playing standards in this style of practice procedure.

The GPS system contends that:
  1. The team is taught a concept in walk-through period
     
  2. The individual, group, then team must show mastery of the concept in a GPS period (ex’s: Shell period, Inside period, S27 period, or 11-11 period)
     
  3. The coaches assess each athletes skill and mastery of the concept within the 12
    periods of a practice.
     
  4. Those that do not master a specific skill will be asked to stay for Indy/Opps
     
Once again, referring to our initial shell period example (Chapter Two).
(Diagram 4.1)

​


​
Picture
Picture
G.P.S. on sale now at Amazon - BUY NOW

Let’s say that the X receiver (the lone isolated receiver to the left of the formation in diagram 4.1) is struggling picking up his quarterback’s signaled audibles to change the initial route. The X continues to run the called slant even after the quarterback has called for a front door change to a quick out. Throughout the rest of the practice, extending into S27, and 11-11 situations, this X receiver continues to bust assignments. Subsequently, the other receivers are picking it all up and succeeding in their called for executions. This will be the perfect situation for Indy/Ops for this particular X receiver.

The residual positives of Indy/Opps
​

“Opps” is short for opportunity. This period should always be deemed as a positive that will help an athlete to get better and improve his chances for success and playing time. This is an excellent time for younger and less experienced players to get more attention and feel “coached-up.”
Indy/Opps should be no longer than fifteen minutes. Again, players should never perceive this time as a punishment. It should be noted that coaches do have the option of ending practice and sending to the locker room those players that have achieved mastery during periods 1-12.

Advice on Indy/Opps

Encourage older and more experienced players to stay out on their own to either assist the players that are struggling (“old teaching the young”), or to work on things they individually feel they need to work on. An example would be a quarterback throwing a fade to his other wide receivers. This time will foster leadership and ownership into the older players.

It is important to never convey a connotation of negativity when a player is asked to stay out for Indy/Ops. The coach should always refrain from making threats that if a player doesn’t pick it up he will be staying for Indy/Ops instead of going in with the rest of the team. Ensure you have established a culture where players staying behind for Indy/Opps never feel singled out or embarrassed, by any other players, or by anyone on the coaching staff. There is a difference between effort, attitude, and skill/concept mastery. Punish a player for lack of effort or a poor attitude, but teach a struggling player mastery through providing him an opportunity.

Celebrate when a player that has struggled, and has diligently stayed out for Indy/Ops, makes a great contribution in a game. Stress to the rest of the team that through extra hard work in Indy/Ops that player has helped himself and his team become successful.

As with the athlete, the coach too must master the proper use of Indy/Ops in S2A GPS.

Indy/Ops takeaways from Coach Hargitt:

Indy/Ops is the last 15 minutes of practice. It is entirely worth noting that this individual time is situated at the end of practice and not at the beginning as is the case in many programs’ traditional practice models. Standard operating procedure has always been to have the position coaches go out and work individual fundamentals before the start of practice. In GPS, we choose to reserve this time for the end of practice. The reason for this is quite simple:  we want the Indy Op to “stick” with the player. Let's say that an offensive lineman has a poor day of kick sliding in pass protection and it was something he struggled with all practice long. If that was not the offensive line coaches emphasis at the start of practice then that player struggled with a technique all practice long and then gets sent home without having that issue reviewed before he leaves. In our Indy Ops period, the offensive line coach will have identified this problem with his players throughout the practice and then will take the last 15 minutes of practice to give that player the individual opportunity to work on his kick slides and get better. The great part of Indy Ops is that it allows the players and coaches to “fix” problems and reinforce good habits before the player leaves for the day instead of waiting until the start of the next practice a full 24 hours later.

​
Picture
GPS on Sale NOW - BUY HERE

0 Comments

#1 New Release on amazon in the football coaching category

1/22/2019

0 Comments

 

 Whole person development

The football coaching edition by sam graham

Picture
Buy WPD NOW

from surface to air system books and media

The publishing arm of S2A is proud to announce the release of a book sure to be on the shelves of every football coach looking to pour into the lives of their players on a deeper level. Sam Graham has taken both, the lessons he's learned from his playing days in the state of Alabama, and combined them with the lessons he's taught from coaching at the high school and collegiate levels.
Picture

Making a lasting impact

The players we coach are going to grow into fathers, husband, and hopefully community leaders. There is no more important time in a young man's life for molding character than  when he is in his teens and early twenties. Grown men that played the great game of football look back and remember the positive and negative things garnered from their coaches. Whole Person Development can be a coach's guidebook to follow so that his current players will look back with gratitude, and be thankful for the character lessons his coach instilled.

Whole person development is on sale now at amazon

Buy WPD Now

About WPD  From Todd Bates, Defensive Line Coach at Clemson

​Sam Graham is a man of God who loves his family. He has spent his life mentoring and coaching young people...which is his mission field. As a young coach, I was blessed to learn under him as he served as my Defensive Coordinator at Oxford High School from 2008-2011. I learned so much about life and what coaching is all about. In his words, not mine, ―It‘s not about how high you jump, and it‘s not how loud you yell, but how straight you walk when you hit the ground. His book Whole Person Development and the Football Coaches Charge is full of principles, morals, codes, and stories to help the next generation coach, or any coach, no matter where they are in their journey. ―It‘s not about the wins, or the friends, but He who lives within that will see us through any situation or circumstance. Watching him (Sam) battle day in and day out with MS has reminded me how to fight and control what I can and trust God to do the rest. Have a blessed day and remember, ―The rest of your life will be the best of your life, but you have to believe it.
Picture

Excerpt from Whole person Development

Whole Person Development is broken into the same segments we prepare for as we approach game time. Warmups, Coin Toss, 1st Quarter, 2nd Quarter, Halftime, 3rd Quarter, 4th quarter, and the post-game analysis. As the old coaching cliché goes, ―We‘ve got to play a full four quarter game to be successful. An organized coach provides a game day itinerary. Approach these pages in the same way. Start fast, be consistent, and close at the end. Sustain the Pace (STP) to ultimately win the game. Just like Coach Hyde taught me and our team, Visualize. Utilize these words, analyze these lessons, and Visualize the power we as coaches have to Develop the Whole Person. Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof. (Proverbs 18:21)

Football Coaches Charge

We would like to send you a free downloadable version of this poem for coaches written by Coach Sam Graham. If you leave us your name and email, we will immediately send you your free copy of Football Coaches Charge. See the Charge below.

    Submit to receive a free download of Football Coaches Charge

Submit
Picture
Buy WPD Now

About Coach Sam Graham

Coach Sam Graham‘s coaching career began at the University of North Alabama in Florence in 1996, where he served as a graduate student assistant under legendary Head Coach Bobby Wallace. From 1997 – 98, he served as the Head Coach at his alma mater, Sylvania High School. In 1999, Graham returned to North Alabama where he coached the defensive line and then secondary coach, under Bill Hyde.

In 2002, Graham moved to Albertville High School where he was the defensive coordinator under Head Coach John Grass. Sam then became the Head Coach (2003-04). From there Graham became the Spiritual/Defensive Coordinator at the University of West Alabama and helped lead team to their first Winning season in 14 years (2005-2007). In the spring of 2008 Graham became the Assistant Head Coach in Charge of Defense at Oxford High School (2008- 2014). There he helped lead team to the 2011 state semi-finals. SAMUEL GRAHAM 82 Sam became the defensive coordinator at Scottsboro High School (2014-2015) and then Head Football coach at Valley Head High (2015-2016). In 2016 he became Athens High‘s strength and conditioning coordinator/linebackers‘ coach until 2017.

​Graham played Linebacker at North Alabama under Head Coach Bobby Wallace from 1991-95. While there, he helped the Lions achieve three straight G.S.C. titles and three Division II National Championships. He is married to the former Amy Tucker of Henagar, Alabama. They have four daughters: Meghan Leigh, Abigail Lauren, Grace Elisabeth, and Sarah Katherine. Life is never dull in the Graham house.
Picture
0 Comments

Rich Hargitt interview

1/6/2019

0 Comments

 

Previewing the National championship game's offenses

Listen in as Coach Hargitt gives some general insight into what the Alabama and Clemson offenses do well in the RPO attack 
Our interview was recorded on the night of 1/6/2019 on the eve of the National Championship Game
Picture
0 Comments

the s2a Blazer Concept

11/28/2018

0 Comments

 
The Bubble screen has been around since Drew Brees was in college setting records at Purdue in the 1990's. The concept then morphed into combining the Bubble with the Slant for a Slant/Bubble progression (see diagram below). Then the Bubble became a common tag as the advent of RPO's began to take hold of the game of football.

Diagram below: This shows a 1/2 field shot of a typical Slant/Bubble concept

This is not blazer - plain old slant bubble. More below

Picture
Through trial and error, in the Surface to Air System, we have found a wrinkle in the Bubble that we need to take advantage of far more often than we have utilized it. We call it Blazer. This concept takes advantage of how a defense structures its coverage and force to defend the Slant/Bubble.

​S2A takes further advantage of how a defense deploys against any behind the line throw (Bubble, Now Screen, etc) by utilizing our Trigger concept.
S2A Members can access "Trigger" here within the Members section

This is blazer

Teaching Blazer

In the still shot below the offense aligns in a Trips set to the field. The #1 WR will run a go, the #2 WR will execute Blazer, and #3 will execute the Bubble.
Picture
Below, the #2 WR works to the outside shoulder of the L2 (S2A defensive ID System) in an upfield circular arc. His eyes are trained to ID the Trigger player. In this case that is L1 that has "triggered" as the force player with the assignment of containing (setting the edge).
​S2A MEMBERS CAN ACCESS S2A Def. I.D System HERE WITHIN THE MEMBERS SECTION
Members note: when going to this System Documents page:
  1. Make sure to be logged in​
  2. The document is the download on the left column, 3rd from bottom
Picture
In the still shot down below, the picture shows both where the #2 WR has leveraged the L2 defender as well as determining who the trigger is (denoted by red dotted line).

key coaching point

It should be noted that the key to the concept is in who #2 is assigned to for blocking purposes if the play were a traditional bubble with stalk blocks. In S2A we strive for Stalks to be Key Read blocks, meaning the onus is on the WR stalking to block the man responsible for force (the Trigger player in zone coverage) and let the deep pass defender go.  In this picture the defensive structure is man, thus making L1 (man to man on #3) trigger to the bubble.

In keeping with this key coaching point (in this case the WR's recognize man to man coverage), the #2 WR leverages (widens) L2 and becomes a "salesman" for the execution of a fake block. This "suckers" L2 into both widening his alignment (opening the grass void area), and taking his eyes back inside to the bubble and off his man. The #2 remains patient, allowing the L1 to Trigger and to pass by him before the receiver advances into the void for a wide open throw.
Picture
Below is the video footage of the play both from the sideline and end-zone angles.

s2a teams executing blazer

In no particular order, the five following video clips showcase various iterations of Blazer.

In full transparency, none of the clips meet our satisfaction of how we will execute the concept in 2019. At the advent of "tinkering" with Blazer we had nothing to compare it to, thus we've learned.

In introducing each clip we will provide a commentary on what we feel we should and will improve on while running it in the 2019 season.

​Clip 1, below: This is executed with a "locked backdoor RPO", using S2A parlance. The #2 should eye the R2 defender as the Trigger (that's who he would block if it were just a traditional bubble only concept). In the execution of #2's route, patience and "gamesmenship" should be employed on the player he would normally be asked to block (R2). The patience employed will make for a much larger grass void for the ball to be thrown in because R2 will increase his force pursuit to the Bubble route.
Note: in 2019 we will ask #1 to run a Go route.
Register for the national rpo clinic
Clip 2, below: Like the clip detailed above, the #2 WR exercises no constraint and patience in allowing his most important portion of the concept to develop. He recognizes who he would block, but shows no "gamesmenship" in feigning it. Then his speed and tempo runs his route into harms way and into the LB hook area. Had he shown patience and then worked to settle in the void grass area, he would have been wide open.
​Note: Again, we will ask the #1 WR to run a Go route in 2019.

Clip 3, below: Again, the play is executed as a backdoor RPO with the concept tag of Blazer. As you study the execution in the clip note two important things.
  1. The QB could have just settled and thrown the Bubble, which is totally fine, because the defensive structure to that side played drop pass and no defender Triggered for Force.
  2. The #2 WR was far too impatient. As in the clip and video of the college at the top of this post, the #2 should have leveraged the defender over him and done a better job of feigning a stalk. The #2 should have broken for the Bee logo area on the 50 yard line, instead he led the QB in having to execute a perfect throw.
Clip 4 below: The defense is almost identical in its assignments and structure to that of the pictures and clip at the top of this post. Again, our #2 WR is neither patient nor a salesman. If he had been, we feel this would have been a much easier opening for the throw.
Clip 5, below: We through this clip in to show the power of what a RPO concept to the backdoor side can do to effect the defensive structure. Blazer can be executed to the backdoor side, but the defense has assigned 4 defenders to not only be over the trips side, but also to react to the pattern of those 3 receivers, thus ignoring the run.

Look for Blazer and more cutting edge concepts at our Clinic

The National RPO Clinic by Surface to air system

We invite you to attend the 2nd annual S2A National RPO Clinic.
WHEN: February 15/16, 2019
WHERE: Indianapolis, IN - at Decatur Central High School near the airport
WHAT: 11 hours of intense learning on the Spread, RPO's, defending the Spread, and stopping RPO's. Click the link below for Registration and details:
Register for the National RPO CLINIC
0 Comments

Preview of chapter 5 from Rich Hargitt's newest book

11/20/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Game Planning & Play Calling in the Age of the RPO

Chapter 5: openers

Buy the book NOW! on Amazon 
Buy Book
Openers are the way in which a play caller chooses to start a football game. The openers are meant to send a message to the defensive coordinator in how the play-caller is going to try to run this football game. In the surface-to-air system it is my preference to always use openers to send the message that this will be a very difficult game from an intellectual standpoint for the defense to attempt to play.

I want to convey two major messages with my openers; the first message I want to convey is that I will be very aggressive trying to score touchdowns, the second message I want to convey is that I will be using a great deal of formations, motions, and other types of changes in order to confuse the defense. The opener that I choose to utilize can change from week-to-week and often does. I do not think that the opener needs to be nor, should it be the same against every opponent every week. The openers are really the way in which the offensive play-caller should attempt to put his stamp on the game.

There are many times where my openers actually have very little to do with how I intend to call the game. Sometimes I will want to call a very aggressive game, so I will call very aggressive openers but at other times I will want to have a more conservative game plan where I rely on my defense in my kicking game and call a very aggressive set of openers. Sometimes I'm going to play reckless go-for-broke style of offensive football and I may start out with very conservative openers. Each week’s openers should be tailored to send the message non-verbally across the sideline that the offensive play-caller wants to convey to the defensive coordinator, his staff, and his players. I feel that openers are really the way to start out a conversation. I want to start out in a variety of different sets. 

​So often, my openers are a manifestation of my desire to move the defense around and dictate the style of play that I wish to play. Therefore, most of the time my openers will include formations that may not be traditional, motions that may not be normal, and generally plays that are designed to send some sort of specific message.

Examples of Game Openers

As was stated above, openers will often change from week to week. These plays should be designed to send a message to the defense each week. Also, as was stated previously, these examples that follow are all examples of openers that we have utilized in our record-breaking offensive years of 2016 and 2017.

The first such opener that I want to explain is the Unbalanced Jet Play (Diagram 5-1).
Picture
​In this play we are bringing our X and Z receivers over into an unbalanced look and adding a sniffer set to the equation. These three athletes allow us to outnumber the defense with the exception of the hash safety or the R1 defender in our Surface to Air System nomenclature. This athlete is accounted for by allowing the tailback to be set to the unbalanced side and sending him to attack the R1. The H receiver will be brought in Jet Motion and shoveled the ball to execute the end around action against the defense. The offensive lineman will simply execute aggressive outside zone footwork. 

​ The reason this play is a great play to use as an opener is because it involves several components that defenses will not like. This play involves using an unbalanced formation, a sniffer Titan set, a running back to the 3- receiver side, and Jet motion from the h receiver. All these components combined make it very difficult for the defense to process what is being done to them and it gives the offensive coordinator a great opportunity to look at the defense and see how they handle a variety of situations. These situations include: how does the defense processes unbalanced sets, how does the defense process a sniffer tight end set, and how does the defense handle motion. The offensive coordinator is then able to see how the defense will handle this variety of situations while also getting himself a big opening play and getting the ball into one of his playmaker’s hands at the very beginning of the contest.

​The next type of opener that has shown itself to be successful the last few years is a play that we in the Surface to Air System call Crazy (Diagram 5-2).
Picture
The crazy play has the advantage that the offensive tackles are split out wide and are with two receivers on the numbers to each side of the field. The center and guards remain in their normal alignment and therefore the quarterback is still able to run zone-read style football in the box.

A simple check by the quarterback is to look to the outside pods and determine whether he has a 3 on 2 advantage and can throw the ball to either pod located out on the numbers. If the quarterback is not able to execute the throw to one of those pods, then he can very simply read the remaining defenders in the box and play zone-read football. This is an excellent way to spread the defense out from sideline to sideline and determine how well the defense can run to the football.

​One of the major components of our system is analyzing whether the defense can identify formational variations and finding out whether they are able to run to the football and make tackles in wide open space. This is a sort of formation and play that allows us to analyze both of those components simultaneously and make a couple great determinations about whether the defense is prepared to play our style of football effectively. This is also a great way to get the ball to playmakers in space and hopefully get a cheap 1st down to start the football game. Defenses will oftentimes realize that we wish to get the ball out of the quarterback’s hands early in the contest and get quick 1st downs. When the defense realizes this, they will oftentimes attempt to jump these quick passes and see if they can get an early turnover. It is therefore useful to utilize a Joker Play early in the contest to keep the defense on their toes (Diagram 5-3).
Picture
So, let's assume that the defense is going to be playing some sort of 1 high structure right here. the offense will come out in a standard 2x2 set and utilize motion into a 3 x 1 set. this serves to allow the offensive coordinator to determine how the defense intends to handle motion from a balanced to an unbalanced set. The offensive coordinator can elect to go ahead and throw now screens to the perimeter and take advantage of any numerical superiority that may be achieved in the flat.

However, a great way to start the football game is to go ahead and throw in a now Joker play and take advantage of the defense’s tendency to jump routes early in the game. If the play is successful, then it's very likely the offense will be up a touchdown after their first possession. If, however the defense sniffs out the Joker play, attacks it, and prevents it from being a score the offensive coordinator has still accomplished his main goal which is to send a message to the defense they should not jump quick routes in the flat. This sort of play serves as a constraint against the defense and the defensive coordinator from jumping quick breaking routes. This sort of play included in your openers list will allow you to throw more high percentage quick throws that enable your quarterback to have success throughout the game because you have backed the defense off and warned them early in the contest.

​Sometimes it is necessary for the offensive coordinator to get into a heavy set and simply play some smash-mouth football with the defense at the start of the football game. It is a great idea, if the offensive coordinator feels like he has the Personnel to do so, to get into a heavy formation and hit the defense and be physical with them early in the contest to see what sort of defensive fronts and character that will create. A great way to do that is by bringing in two sniffers and running inside zone with a double split kick out by those two sniffers from a pistol set (Diagram 5-4).
Picture
This formation and its personnel grouping might be hard to utilize later in the game as some of the personnel might be borrowed from the defense. It is best to use these heavy sets early in the game before those linebacker type of players off your defense have become fatigued from playing multiple quarters of defense. This is another way to send a message to the defensive coordinator that you intend to be physical and attempt to run the football as a standard part of the game plan.

Conclusion

It is an important part of calling plays to understand what openers are and why they are being utilized. Openers should be a way for the offensive coordinator to send a message not only to the defensive staff but also to his own sideline.

These plays are a way to demonstrate how and where and with what sort of physicality the offense of coordinator intends to call the game. It should also be said that openers should draw the eye of the defensive coordinator to what the offensive coordinator wants him to see. These plays for me are essentially a way for me to mess with the head of the defensive coordinator and show him things and established precedents for later in the game. I want to make the defensive coordinator worry about formations and motions and other sorts of twists and variations that may or may not be a part of the overall game plan.

​I am also looking to establish tempo with many of these openers being one-word calls that we created for that week. Lastly, I am attempting to get cheap first downs and big chunks of offense yardage where I know I can flip the field at a bare minimum make sure that I can punt the football onto my opponent's end of the field or even get a cheap touchdown or field goal to start the contest. I have long felt that openers are a critical part of being an effective play-caller in a system like ours but unfortunately, they are one of the more underutilized and undervalued aspects of play-calling in the modern game of football. I feel that these plays should be emphasized and discussed and be a useful part of every offensive coordinator’s repertoire when he goes into a game. These are also a fun and exciting “Strike Up the Band” sort of plays and send a message to both sidelines that you intend to come out and play fast and to play physical in each contest


Buy the book NOW! on Amazon
Buy book
0 Comments

The s2a trident model

11/5/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture

Rationale    
The purpose of S2A Trident is to specifically explain how the game of football has evolved.  In 2018, Emmett High School rushed for 736 yards on 226 attempts. The team produced 2,656 yards passing on 242 of 394 passing.  The statistics imply that Emmett was a pass first football team that lacked balance. The breakdown makes the team a 39% run and 61% pass football team.  Below is a breakdown of the run vs pass ratio for all 9 games of the 2018 season.

Picture

This chart clearly implies that Emmett High School is a pass first football team as its ratio favored the pass 8 out of the 9 football games played.  If however, the passes completed behind the line of scrimmage were to be combined with the traditional runs then a new metric would appear. The S2A System prides itself on a proliferation of “long handoffs” that are really just runs in space such as the H Calls.  When the runs are combined with passes behind the line of scrimmage the numbers are as follows:

Run vs Pass Breakdown Using Trident Model

Picture
Picture

This new metric is known in the S2A System as the Trident Model because it shows that there are three areas to attack a defense; in the box with a run, outside the box and behind the line of scrimmage with a pass, and down the field past the line of scrimmage with a pass.  These statistics completely change the 2018 season at Emmett High School. The season now swung all the way back to favor run first play calling in all 9 football games. If runs are paired with behind the line of scrimmage passes as just one category, a run category, then there's a change per game in percentage of run plays called by the following:
Columbia: + 14%
Middleton: +30%
Vallivue: + 16%
Bishop Kelly: + 23%
Ridgevue: + 10%
Jerome: +17%
Caldwell: + 19%
Nampa: + 8%
​ Kuna: +27%
    For instance, in the Ridgevue game the conventional way of doing run to pass balance says that Emmett High School was 53% run and 47% pass but once the Trident Model is applied the numbers change by a full 10% to 63% run and only 37% pass.  These behind the line passes that are such a part of the S2A System are really just as safe as traditional runs and feature very similar blocking schemes to isolation and power plays but they are run 20 yards away from box defenders that are hard to block.  The Trident Model makes Emmett High School a much more balanced football team by run to pass balance ratios.

Results of the Research
    The previously discussed data completely transforms the reality of the run to pass ratio for an S2A System member school.  If the traditional model is applied then Emmett High School was a 39% to 61% run to pass balance football team that threw for 2,656 yards and rushed for only 736 yards.  If however, the Trident Model is applied those numbers change drastically. Under the Trident Model the numbers for 2018 are that the offense was 55% to 45% run to pass a full 16% shift in the play calling.  The offense also produced 2,083 yards of total passing offense with 1,309 yards of rushing when runs and passes behind the line of scrimmage are combined. This new and more modern evaluation of the statistical data makes the S2A System a more practical way to determine the true run to pass balance on a football team.  When the offense features a Bubble Screen to the perimeter with two receivers cross blocking the offense is really executing a run play that is quite familiar; the two fullback isolation play. This Trident Model makes the statistical analysis much more relevant to what is actually being called in the games and allows the offense to be seen as much more rational in its run to pass balance and more traditional than was once envisioned.

Conclusion
    Offenses will continue to set records and record their yards based upon whether the ball was a handoff or a forward pass.  However, this Trident Model that has been created in the S2A System is a useful and more practical way to analyze the effectiveness of one’s play calling.  The Now Screen thrown 10 yards outside is really a run play and many coaches see it as just that. This model simply brings to light and illuminates the true nature of the offensive play caller’s intentions more than the physics behind whether the ball was handed off or thrown forward.  Hopefully this system is useful and practical in breaking down your own offensive metrics and play calling tendencies.

1 Comment

Protect the game? I've got bad news, and i've got some good news

6/27/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
The "twittersphere" themes (tweets, retweets, likes, and reactions) of those that I follow in the football world usually fall into three distinct categories:  
  1. Check out this great scheme
  2. Football is under attack and dying
  3. Football is great, leave it alone.

What I rarely, if ever see is a proactive solution for making the game better. I seldom see a healthy dialog for continuing football's growth with solid plans attached.

There have been plenty of reactive "safe" measures implemented. I feel, however, the unintended consequences of some of these "knee jerk" safety reactions will actually have opposite and negative effects toward the things they're intended to fix.

EXAMPLES OF SAFETY REACTION PROTOCOLS AT ALL LEVELS OF THE SPORT
  1. Limit practice time
  2. Limit time to teach fundamentals
  3. Enact tackling protocol that have not always been thoroughly thought out 
  4. See the new NFL rule (more below) on lowering the head

In part, some of the reactions are positive. There have been coaches that have gone too far in the name of winning, and it has led associations to limit and curtail all of us. Some do practice too much and hit too much. Across the board, dead periods and time constraints have been put in place.

As for tackling, it needs to be taught properly, and it has probably become a "lost art" of technique. However, the unintended consequences for some of the measures have not been thought out in the name of "safe". Pressurized decisions and mandates often and ultimately lead to a game that produces the opposite of their intended, "better and safer".

Mandatory and arbitrary limits often do just that, limit proper preparedness for the physical demands of the game, thus actually causing more harm. Some "standardized" tackling mandates do not take into account strength, athletic ability, and size mis-matches that occur in every player and in every game. Again, some of these reactions have not been thoroughly thought out in the name of all things safety.

MY MOTIVES FOR OFFERING A SOLUTION

I was a fortunate kid in that I knew my vocational destiny before most kids could even dream about wanting to be an astronaut, fireman, or a cowboy. My earliest memories were of my Dad coaching football and interacting with his players. I drank in everyone of those moments and dreamt of the day I would be able do the same. Coaching football, and everything related to it was truly the only work I've ever wanted to do. 

I clearly remember in the early 1970's, when I was about 10 years old, and asking my Dad what I thought was a scary question. "Daddy", I asked, "do you think football will still be a big thing when I get old enough to coach?" His answer was both reassuring and believable. In short, he said yes, and he gave me evidence of why it would be even more popular by the time I reached the coaching appropriate age. Indeed, the game would continue to grow in both numbers participating and in popularity throughout the time I began my career in 1986. Football kept growing to the point of bypassing the American past-time and turned into the Nation's Primetime. This trend continued until the second decade of the 2,000's, when concussions and head trauma became a cause, and football became the scapegoat.
​
So for the most part, my Dad was right, except for the fact that he probably far under shot just how big football has become. Case in point, for the vast majority of my Dad's career he was a Division 1 College assistant football coach. When he retired in 1995 he had never made over $50,000 per year in coaching salary. In comparison, now in 2018, there are many high school coaches making over $100,000.

My Dad was a positive thinker, and he pretty well predicted the prolific growth of the game of football. What he did not predict, and had no way of knowing, was the equally prolific attack the game is experiencing, and therefore, in many places, its noticeable numeric decline, thus my motivation for offering a solution.

I rarely if ever see rationale suggestions to improve and continue to grow the game in an intelligent way.  

The "game" is all I've ever really known and cared about in terms of a vocation. I don't have to tell you what it's taught me and given to me, and if you've read this far, I certainly don't have to convince you here of what it has done for the fabric of American society and the countless young people it has molded.

My motivation is to be able to answer my two young grandsons the same way my Dad answered me, "Yes, son, the game will be bigger and better when you're old enough."

BACK TO THE BAD NEWS

This is where the "bad news" part of this blog post's title needs to be addressed.  The bad news is that a decline in the game is directly being felt due to the proliferation of reports of CTE and head trauma (SPOILER ALERT - this part is nothing new). We all know football unfairly takes the brunt of the media negativity when it comes to this bad news. Head injuries are head injuries, and few physically demanding team sports are spared from their trauma, but our game of football takes the vast majority of the negativity related to this subject.

Through news outlets and social media, their is a daily barrage of CTE and football related "hit" pieces. There is an almost equal amount of "social media influencers" pushing back with posts of "PROTECT THE GAME!" Headlines and provocative "clickbait" hashtags prevail on both sides, but I rarely if ever see rationale suggestions to improve and continue to grow the game in an intelligent way.  

MORE bad news.

Headline this summer (June 2018): Washington State football player who committed suicide had extensive CTE and the brain of a 65-year-old
​

Picture
The family of the Washington State University football player who died of suicide in January said the 21-year-old quarterback had extensive brain damage that's been linked to concussions from playing the sport. Tyler Hilinski was found dead in his apartment with a gunshot wound and a suicide note on Jan. 16.
NOTE: Stay with me here, remember I love football, and I derive my livelihood from it.

The Tyler Hilinski news "rocked" me, and I confess I've either ignored most other reports of this nature, or "blown them off" due to lack of scientific support, or a bias in reporting. But something in being just 21 years old, and a fresh autopsy of evidence got my attention. Even the most brazened football tough guy should take pause in this report.
NOTE: I do believe the Hilinski related articles are filled with bias of both PRO and CON for football.

And MORE bad news (remember, stay with me here), actually this news may turn out to be more goofy than bad. Instituted in the off-season of 2018: NFL institutes 15-yard penalty, possible ejection for lowering head to make hit
​
Picture
Potentially every play in the NFL could result in a penalty under the stipulations of this rule
I don't know if the NFL is having a knee jerk reaction or if the implementation of this rule will impact the game in a positive manner, the 2018 season will prove out a lot. Needless to say, our game has changed, and it's not going back to my childhood of the 1970's.

​
Picture
Jack Lambert
Picture
Jack Tatum
Before we get to the good news (finally!), let's face some realities for the game of football as we know it in 2018 and moving forward into its future.

We are not going back to the Jack Lambert (Dracula in cleats) and Jack Tatum (see assassin references) days of football. Society and culture have changed, and this isn't the blog to delve into all that. Many believe that today's generational society, if faced with World War III, would not come out victorious like our predecessors of the "Greatest Generation" in World War II. Football is changing and it needs answers, not knee jerk reactions, not goofy unenforceable rules, and certainly not a pollyanna "rose-colored glasses guy" telling you "everything is OK (see twitter posts of many of these). 

THE GOOD NEWS -SOLUTIONS 

Full disclosure: I am a founder in The Surface To Air System (S2A). We are an offensive consulting service specializing in spread offense and we specifically teach and consult about RPO's. I hope you don't stop reading here. This is not a veiled attempt at a commercial for S2A. However, my hope is to offer the beginnings of a dialog and thought process that can and will lead to ideas that will both make the game safer and better. I will use some things we do within S2A to make my case.

I am a spread offensive minded coach, but regardless of the tactical philosophies one may employ and believe in, we still need to enter into a frank discussion of determining solutions for saving and growing our game. Again, I'm tired of the empty rhetoric that starts with, "our game is under attack", let's drop the phrases and enter into solutions. 

MAKING THE CASE FOR WHY SPREAD AND RPO ATTACKS ARE A SOLUTION
  1. Spreading it out and having multiple options creates space
    • Space allows for the game to be executed in more one on one situations
    • One on one situations limit pileups and multiple collisions 
  2. This style of offense can create fun and excitement
    • More basketball and track athletes get involved
    • Fans like to see the ball come out and be spread around
  3. Practice procedures in the S2A lend themselves to safety
    • ​The S2A GPS is a revolutionary way of practicing in a safer environment
    • S27 allows for the reps and game simulation in a safer environment

1. THE CASE FOR SPREADING IT OUT

Let's briefly breakdown each case/solution by first looking at a typical RPO.
Picture

The concept shown allows for the ball to be placed in as many as five spots between pre-snap and post-snap reads. The formation stresses the defensive structure to spread itself into areas it may not want to go. The Sniffer (Y) is counted as a third receiver to the trips side of the formation, thus causing the defense to devalue the box by only leaving five defenders. The result of the play is the ball being handed off to the T on the inside zone. The offense has the advantage in the box.

It can be argued that any option chosen in the play above allows for space and one on one situations across the field. 
  1. Had the ball been thrown to the Z receiver, more than likely he would have been taking on one defender to both make the catch and gain yardage.
  2. It can be seen and visually proven that each lineman is executing a one on one block utilizing techniques that stress the importance of eyes, hands, and feet. Helmet to helmet contact is at a minimum. 
  3. If Y would have received the pop pass he would be in space and one on one against a safety.
  4. If H would have received the bubble he would be in space and more than likely be faced with one defender in a situation to make a play.
  5. Ultimately, the QB read the "triangled" five technique for give or keep. Either choice leaves both space and few numbers of defenders to create a pile up.

The general scheme shown checks the boxes on solutions of saving the game for safety sake in terms of creating open space and morphing the game into more one on one match ups. For time and space sake I won't post the numerous other RPO schemes that produce the same effect, but suffice it to say the spirit of the Run Pass Option lends itself to safety above other schemes I have been involved in.

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE TO BE VERY UNPOPULAR

I have served as both a head high school coach and as a college offensive coordinator. In 30 seasons from serving in both of those roles I have been exposed to and have run almost every scheme in modern football. I have employed the I, the Wing-T, the Veer, and the Spread. These four offensive approaches arguably are still the most popular and most utilized in the game today.

The unpopular part (hide the women and children), these offensive attacks may go the way of the current kickoff. Let's face it, the act of kicking the ball off is going away. The NFL has already begun the legislation of putting this thought in motion. The offensive schemes mentioned above tend to create (no, not entirely) a tough line of scrimmage point of attack mentality of "knock em off the ball" teaching. No play in football is any tougher than the old ISO. I have heard many coaches refer to it as a "man maker". Each of the offenses mentioned incorporate some form of the play. The inevitable result is compressed space, more bodies, and more pile ups.
Picture
Picture
Before the hate mail starts, allow me to ask a couple of questions: When is the last time you went to a football practice at the high school level or above and witnessed the old Oklahoma drill? This drill used to be THE DRILL, not any more. It is seldom to ever used in today's practices. Speaking of practice, when's the last time a team at any level has incorporated 2-a-days for two days in a row into there pre-season schedule? Not too long ago, in the 80's and into the 90's, we would have two full weeks of 2-a-days.

OK, I'll just come out and say it, (and believe me, it hurts) "smash mouth", "blood and guts" staples of the I, Veer, and Wing-T are going away, and going away with them will be the very essence of the I, Veer, and Wing-T and the schemes they employ. Sorry it's the truth because it's the trend. It's the trend just like the way of the death of network TV is the trend. Did you ever think there would be a day when almost everything we consume is through a phone? When was the last time you sat down and watched the 6:00 o'clock news? It's just the truth. 

I can't say as a current coach that I embrace all the changes. I can even go as far as agreeing that many of the alterations to the fabric of the game are a result of the pacification of today's society, but as a former player, and now somewhat from the perspective of a parent, I feel most of the changes are healthy.

2. THE CASE FOR MORE FUN AND EXCITEMENT

The logic for fun and excitement lends itself to getting more participation. Football still does and will always attract people that want to be tested, pushed, and challenged. No other team game has ever come close to what football produces in these areas. However, there is no doubt that numbers are down in participation from the high school level down.

The game has challengers like never before:
  • Indoor sports
  • "Participation trophy" sports
  • Negative press that creates "scared moms"
  • Video games

It's getting tougher and tougher to attract the speed and skill athletes off the basketball courts and off the track team. This is nothing new, but it has developed a larger problem due to football receiving a lot of bad press - kids want to touch the ball and utilize their skill in space. Why don't we embrace that?

An offense that allows for the opportunity to accentuate skill (running, jumping, catching) is more conducive to participation. Again, looking at a typical RPO, as many as five athletes on one play can anticipate the opportunity to receive the ball.​
Picture
Schemes like this RPO lend themselves to attracting more athletes to the game.
3. PRACTICE PROCEDURES THAT LEND THEMSELVES TO SAFETY

The Surface To Air System has created a procedure of practice that by its very nature creates safety as its main by-product. The S2A System has coined the phrase: S2A GPS. This new style of practice lends itself to solutions for the problems being discussed here. GPS stands for Guided Practice System.

The cornerstone of the S2A GPS lies in the "Shells" portion of the practice that allows for game simulation in terms of speed and decision making, while limiting contact and hitting. The game speed simulation checks all the boxes for what current sports scientist are decreeing as essential for team preparation, while also checking the boxes of controlled safety concerns.   

Picture
The above diagram shows a typical RPO concept being taught through the S2A GPS Shell. The Shell is a variation on the practice staple of the 7 on 7 drill, but with the added dimension of run reads, run plays, and pre snap/post snap RPO's.  

In GPS Shells the offense is faced with game like speed and decision making in space, and within controlled game-like one on one skill development. Both the offense and defensive players are challenged to compete, think, and produce through the concept of the offensive call and the shell of the defensive coverage.

The GPS can be utilized in any offensive and defensive scheme. To learn more about the intricacies of utilizing the GPS leave a comment with your questions or email. We will be glad to share full schedules and examples of how we utilize this as a full practice (start to finish) format. 

A BETTER WAY TO 7 ON 7: THE ADVENT OF S27

The gripes and complaints have always been the same: The defense doesn’t play their coverages honestly, the linebackers play at 8 yards deep, the defense doesn’t respect play action, and what about the linemen? Maybe the loudest current complaint is that 7 on 7 has taken good coaching out of the equation and put it into the hands of an AAU like basketball environment.

By its nature, 7 on 7 is a reasonably safe way to practice some portions of the game like passing concepts and pass defense. Then why, it may be argued, is 7 on 7 being discussed in this blog post? The answer, because of what it's turning into and what it's taking away from. The drill (7 on 7) has morphed into a business. It has opened the door for the high school team to lose some control, and that control is leaving the confines of amateur governing bodies and slipping from the oversight of good high school football coaches. Quite simply, that is dangerous, and the bottom line is that it's detrimental  to our game.

This blog post, at it's outset, attempts to protect the game by offering real solutions and not hyped up talk. S27 offers yet another solution.

The difference in S27 and 7 on 7 is that S27 combines the passing of 7 on 7 with some run aspects of a flag football game. This provides the coach the ability to utilize his mental skills to teach, execute, and perfect RPO's. Something quite frankly, a "street coach" can't apply because of his part-time application and limited study of the game.

Everything works like 7 on 7 except:
  1. The offense adds a live offensive tackle and the defense adds a live 5 technique     over the offensive tackle. The OT can make1 of  3 blocking scheme movements based on the scheme called (Pass set, inside veer release, or lock/turnout). The 5 tech. can read and react to the 3 scheme blocking techniques. Thus, the OL gets work!
  2. The QB and the Running back wear flags, as in flag football. This allows for the execution and the true defensive reactions of a real game through the RPO attack.

​In the diagram below the offense employs a 3 x 1 set and executes an inside Zone Read RPO package. The QB has no fewer than 6 legitimate options to go with the ball.
  1. To the Grass slant on the front door side — depending of the alignment of R2
  2. Give the ball on the Inside Zone if the 5 tech. feather's the OT’s down veer release
  3. Keep the ball if the 5 tech. squeezes
  4. Throw the ball to #3 (trips side) on the hitch if LM triggers to the QB
  5. Throw the ball to #2 (trips side) on the quick out if L2 converges on QB or #3
  6. Throw the ball to #1 (trips side) on the fade 

The defense has to honestly align to the 3 x 1 set. Then the defense has to decide whether to widen R2 and LM (devaluing the box), or tighten down R2 and LM back into the box.

 
Picture
Again, the rules of S27 dictate that it is a hybrid drill that combines the best of 7 on 7 and flag football while allowing for a coach to instruct a full RPO scheme. Most importantly, it forces the defense to align and react in a similar fashion to that of a game, thus forcing them to play honest and play similar to that of a normal 11 on 11 game.

In the same vein of providing more information on GPS above, we will also provide a full write up on S27. To learn more about the intricacies of utilizing the S27 and seeing the rules leave a comment with your questions or email.

​To restate the title of this post: Protect the Game? I've got bad news, and I've got some good news.
​

The good news is that we have listed reasonable and tangible ideas to accomplish the goal of protecting the game. Society is changing (changed), and young athletes are growing up now with a different prospective than those of their Fathers and Grandfathers. We as coaches need to determine with our eyes wide open the solutions that will both save and grow the game. Unfortunately the battle will not be won with mantras, slogans, and a love for the game.

Oh yea, the bad news? Just read the headlines, follow the twitter posts, talk to moms, and watch a few episodes of  Outside The Lines. In other words, "yes", clearly the game is under attack. We must provide real solutions to fix it.
Protect the game? I've got bad news, and i've got some good news

​
0 Comments

    Author

    Rick Butler

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    June 2018

    Categories

    All
    Book Preview

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Members Section
    • 2018/2019 National RPO Clinics
    • 2019 National RPO Clinic
    • S2A glossary
  • CoachTube and Course Vault
    • Installation One
    • Installation Two
    • Installation Three
    • Game Planning Installation Course
  • Spread Defensive Masterminds
  • Store
  • Subscription
  • Blog
  • S2A Buyers Club
  • S2A glossary
  • S27
  • Clinic Bundle